Skip to content

Work · Earlier Work

Museum Consulting

Label voice for a science museum in Bihar, gallery labels for a percussion museum, and focus groups that reset a plan in Ohio. Decide the voice, then write.

RolePrincipal, Brilliant Idea Studio, 2017 to 2019
DisciplineInterpretation · Content Strategy · Research
OutcomeA label voice system, gallery labels, a focus-group report
One museum label written in five registers, with the museum personality facets tested on Jupiter

Context

Between museum jobs I ran a consulting practice for cultural institutions. Three engagements show the method: settle the voice before a single label is drafted, write to a word count, and listen before recommending.

Bihar: one label, five voices

Rhythm! Discovery Center: the labels

Massillon Museum: four focus groups

  1. Listen first. Four groups, 18 participants, eight questions, over two days in January 2017: members, docents, artists, educators, board.
  2. Find the pattern. Loyal audience, loved staff, and four gaps: interactive space, more challenging exhibitions, educator and artist programmes, outreach.
  3. Recommend specifically. Touch galleries built from collection favourites, art and history shown together, pop-up exhibits downtown during construction, teacher materials as PDFs.
  4. Deliver fast. Report to the museum on February 16, 2017, four weeks after the last group.

Why It Works

  • A voice decided on paper first means fifty labels agree with each other.
  • Word counts are a design constraint, not an afterthought.
  • Focus groups earn their keep when the recommendations name the exhibit, the object, and the audience.
5
Registers written for one label
3
Percussion galleries labelled
18
Focus-group participants
4
Weeks from last group to report

Like this kind of work?

Get in touch See other work →